Implementing a new Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system can feel like trading one headache for dozens, but limping along with manual reporting and systems that can’t scale hurts even more.
Once board packets take days, subsidiaries confuse your ledger, or automation stalls under spreadsheets, you’ve crossed the “must-change” line.
Ashley Honeyman, COO/CFO at Consero Global, and Jennifer Daniel, VP of Onboarding, with decades of combined experience with ERP implementations, shared insights on the complexities involved, mistakes to avoid, and implementation best practices that every finance leader should know before rolling out a new ERP.
Signs You’ve Outgrown Your Current Systems
Many organizations reach a scale where their existing financial systems can no longer support their growth and operational needs.
If your company is experiencing one or more of the following, you may need a new ERP:
“When your board or your team need advanced reporting, if you’ve got an Excel workbook with 15 tabs that requires three business days to do inputs, reconciliations, clean up, that’s a really good sign that you need to evaluate a new general ledger or ERP to solve for that for you.”
Implementation Options
There are generally three options for a new ERP implementation, each with its own set of considerations.
Choose the right approach for your business needs
Direct with a VAR Partner
Selecting an ERP system directly and partnering with a Value-Added Reseller (VAR) for implementation. The VAR brings system expertise, while the company provides business and accounting knowledge.
Key Requirement: Your team will be responsible for mapping, cleaning, and inputting the data.
- Direct control over system selection
- VAR provides technical expertise
- Company retains business knowledge control
- Potentially lower ongoing costs
- Greater customization options
- Requires significant internal expertise
- Team responsible for data management
- Higher risk of implementation delays
- More hands-on involvement required
- Potential for scope creep
Outsourced Bookkeeping/Accounting
Engaging a bookkeeper or accounting service provider to handle the implementation. Suitable if internal teams have sufficient system knowledge.
- Leverages existing accounting relationships
- May combine with VAR expertise
- Accounting knowledge already in place
- Potentially cost-effective
- Familiar with your business processes
- Requires bookkeeper to have systems experience
- Limited to current provider’s capabilities
- May lack ERP implementation expertise
- Dependent on third-party availability
- Potential knowledge gaps in complex systems
Finance as a Service (FaaS) Partner
Partnering with a provider that offers an end-to-end solution, including the technology, implementation, and ongoing management of the finance function.
FaaS partners like Consero implement pre-configured tech stacks and bring deep ERP implementation expertise, significantly reducing the risk, cost, and implementation timeline.
- End-to-end solution provider
- Pre-configured tech stacks
- Deep ERP implementation expertise
- Reduced risk and cost
- Faster implementation timeline
- Ongoing management included
- Less direct control over implementation
- Ongoing service dependency
- Less customization flexibility
- Vendor lock-in considerations
Unlike with VARs, a FaaS partner will be utilizing the new system and owning the reporting inputs and outputs. “A FaaS partner has to own the outcome—so we won’t put in a process that won’t work, because we’re the ones running it tomorrow.”
Traditional ERP vs. FaaS Implementation
| Factor | Traditional ERP + VAR | Consero FaaS |
|---|---|---|
| Timeline | 9–18 months (plus soft-parallel period) | 30–90 days to deployment |
| Data Migration | Client responsibility, high workload | Consero owned & executed |
| Up-front Cost | $80k–$150k services + full-year licenses | Integrated into service fee |
| Staff Burden | Heavy; risk of burnout/turnover | Light; focus on strategic input |
| Ongoing Changes | Pay-as-you-go consultants | Included, operated by Consero |
| Failure Rate | Up to 60% miss at least one objective | Near-perfect delivery |
Key Considerations for ERP Rollout
Honeyman and Daniel highlight six crucial considerations for finance leaders ahead of a successful ERP implementation.
1. System and Partner Selection
The right ERP system and implementation partner is paramount to the success of the project.
Start here:
- Identify the Problems: Map the specific problems you are trying to solve (e.g., reporting, automation, revenue recognition, or all of the above).
- Evaluate System Capabilities: Know the ERP players (Oracle NetSuite, Sage Intacct, etc.) and vet their suitability for your use cases and requirements.
Modern stacks, such as Consero’s SIMPL platform, mix an ERP backbone with third-party best-in-class apps (such as Bill.com, Ramp, Expensify).
- Map Finance Workflows: Your current workflows versus your desired finance workflows. Be cautious not to replicate inefficient existing processes.
- Assess Partner Expertise: Select a partner (VAR or FaaS) that brings the necessary system and industry expertise, can complete the implementation on time and within budget, and can solve your pain points.
FaaS offers a pre-built, integrated tech stack tailored to specific industries, reducing the lengthy software selection process while providing access to best practices.
“With FaaS, the infrastructure is already defined, reducing implementation complexity significantly,” says Honeyman.
Companies like Insurity show what’s possible when you start with Consero’s ready-built FaaS platform. They rolled three acquisitions onto one clean general ledger in months leveraging Consero’s pre-configured tech stack, proven industry playbooks, and team of experts.
2. Implementation Scope and Complexity
Defining a realistic implementation scope and understanding the inherent complexities are crucial for managing expectations and avoiding project derailment.
Scope considerations:
